The Real Reason why Go is not so Popular



The Real Reason why Go is not so Popular

The Real Reason why Go is not so Popular

Supporting FAUN is investing in your productivity & growth:
πŸ‘‰ https://www.buymeacoffee.com/joinFAUN

Join us:

πŸ‘‰ Join FAUN – Developer Community: https://faun.dev/join
πŸ‘‰ Developer Goodies: https://bytevibe.co
πŸ‘‰ Learn CloudNative: https://learn.faun.dev

====================================================

Golang Books we recommend:

πŸ”– Go Programming Language, The (Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series)
https://amzn.to/3QfP7ZN

πŸ”– Go in Action:
https://amzn.to/3vJAEMd

πŸ”– Go Web Programming:
https://amzn.to/3GmxRNK

πŸ”– Hands-on Go Programming: Learn Google’s Golang Programming, Data Structures, Error Handling and Concurrency
https://amzn.to/3WS9WNs

πŸ”– Mastering Go: Create Golang production applications using network libraries, concurrency, machine learning, and advanced data structures.
https://amzn.to/3QkhB4t

πŸ”– Other Golang books:
https://amzn.to/3VN9ZZA

====================================================

ℹ️ About this video:

Why is Go, the programming language developed by Google in 2007, not as widely adopted as some other languages? Is it due to its relatively new status, with only 15 years under its belt compared to more established languages? Could it be the fact that Go is a statically-typed language, which some developers find less appealing than dynamically-typed languages? Or perhaps it’s because Go has fewer features and libraries available, making it less flexible than other options. Or maybe it’s simply because Go has a smaller share of the market, with fewer job opportunities available for Go developers. In this video, we’ll dive deep into these potential reasons and examine the future of Go in the world of programming.

#️⃣ Keywords:

Google, programming, language, Golang, popular, user, base, Netflix, Docker, reasons, adopted, statically-typed, variables, developers, Python, developed by, high-profile, growing user, dynamically-typed, fewer features, third-party, comprehensive standard, programming language, existing systems, newer language, relative niche, smaller user, lower adoption, fewer job, long time

Comments are closed.